<?xml version="1.0" encoding=""?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Bond Walks Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://greatbong.net/2006/11/19/the-bond-walks-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://greatbong.net/2006/11/19/the-bond-walks-again/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 11:21:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kabaddi Kabaddi</title>
		<link>http://greatbong.net/2006/11/19/the-bond-walks-again/#comment-62006</link>
		<dc:creator>Kabaddi Kabaddi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 14:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatbong.net/2006/11/19/the-bond-walks-again/#comment-62006</guid>
		<description>GB...I specifically said Tommorow never Dies and Not Die Another Day...I agree Die Another Day was just selling the Bond Name and making money but Tommorow Never Dies had it all...the action,the girls and a villain who was smart and evil and hence a &quot;Bond Villain&quot;.....If only Daniel could mix up the two perfectly and serve us the perfect bond movie(.....I could have said Goldfinger but ....)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GB&#8230;I specifically said Tommorow never Dies and Not Die Another Day&#8230;I agree Die Another Day was just selling the Bond Name and making money but Tommorow Never Dies had it all&#8230;the action,the girls and a villain who was smart and evil and hence a &#8220;Bond Villain&#8221;&#8230;..If only Daniel could mix up the two perfectly and serve us the perfect bond movie(&#8230;..I could have said Goldfinger but &#8230;.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shrikant Joshi</title>
		<link>http://greatbong.net/2006/11/19/the-bond-walks-again/#comment-61895</link>
		<dc:creator>Shrikant Joshi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 10:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatbong.net/2006/11/19/the-bond-walks-again/#comment-61895</guid>
		<description>I know it&#039;s a bit late, well, a month late to be precise.

But I just had to clear out some misgivings. I started writing them in a comment, but eventually converted it into a blog-post. 

Have already done a pingback, here&#039;s a manual TrackBack:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://42quirks.com/2006/12/08/bond-but-not-007-yet-casino-royale/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bond, but not 007, yet: Casino Royale&lt;/a&gt;

Hope to hear from you on this one :)

Thanks,
Shrikant Joshi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know it&#8217;s a bit late, well, a month late to be precise.</p>
<p>But I just had to clear out some misgivings. I started writing them in a comment, but eventually converted it into a blog-post. </p>
<p>Have already done a pingback, here&#8217;s a manual TrackBack:<br />
<a href="http://42quirks.com/2006/12/08/bond-but-not-007-yet-casino-royale/" rel="nofollow">Bond, but not 007, yet: Casino Royale</a></p>
<p>Hope to hear from you on this one <img src='http://greatbong.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Shrikant Joshi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 42 Quirks - &#187; Bond, but not 007, yet: Casino Royale</title>
		<link>http://greatbong.net/2006/11/19/the-bond-walks-again/#comment-61877</link>
		<dc:creator>42 Quirks - &#187; Bond, but not 007, yet: Casino Royale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 10:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatbong.net/2006/11/19/the-bond-walks-again/#comment-61877</guid>
		<description>[...] Read it here: The Bond Walks Again. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read it here: The Bond Walks Again. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://greatbong.net/2006/11/19/the-bond-walks-again/#comment-61834</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 08:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatbong.net/2006/11/19/the-bond-walks-again/#comment-61834</guid>
		<description>Hello, An excellent site. I am able to learn many stotras. Very good work.  
 http://restor.blogster.com/cialis_2.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, An excellent site. I am able to learn many stotras. Very good work.<br />
 <a href="http://restor.blogster.com/cialis_2.html" rel="nofollow">http://restor.blogster.com/cialis_2.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tipu</title>
		<link>http://greatbong.net/2006/11/19/the-bond-walks-again/#comment-58046</link>
		<dc:creator>Tipu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 03:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatbong.net/2006/11/19/the-bond-walks-again/#comment-58046</guid>
		<description>GB, like you I enjoyed this Bond too.  By DAD, the whole Bond thing had become a parody of a parody, &amp; Daniel Craig has successfully given it a jhatka.  As Gaurav said, the parkour style opening fight in the beginning made it clear right on that thsi was not another of your shaken not stirred Bonds.  In fact, it was Sebastian Foucan, one of the inventors of parkour, who plays the bomb maker in the opening scene.  Another parkour founder, David Belle, acted in the Luc Besson-produced movie District B13, which came out in the US earlier this year.

Another interesting side-note is that Martin Campbell, who directed CR, also made (imho) Brosnan&#039;s best Bond outing, his Bondebut - Goldeneye.  That one revived the franchise after the wilderness of the Dalton years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GB, like you I enjoyed this Bond too.  By DAD, the whole Bond thing had become a parody of a parody, &amp; Daniel Craig has successfully given it a jhatka.  As Gaurav said, the parkour style opening fight in the beginning made it clear right on that thsi was not another of your shaken not stirred Bonds.  In fact, it was Sebastian Foucan, one of the inventors of parkour, who plays the bomb maker in the opening scene.  Another parkour founder, David Belle, acted in the Luc Besson-produced movie District B13, which came out in the US earlier this year.</p>
<p>Another interesting side-note is that Martin Campbell, who directed CR, also made (imho) Brosnan&#8217;s best Bond outing, his Bondebut &#8211; Goldeneye.  That one revived the franchise after the wilderness of the Dalton years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shivangi</title>
		<link>http://greatbong.net/2006/11/19/the-bond-walks-again/#comment-55446</link>
		<dc:creator>Shivangi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 04:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatbong.net/2006/11/19/the-bond-walks-again/#comment-55446</guid>
		<description>I was scared to read what you have to say... I loved Casino Royale. I loved Daniel Craig. But mostly, I loved how for once Bond is made to look human. 
I noticed the lack of &quot;silhouettes of sexy ladies dancing seductively in the opening credits&quot;. Bond somehow, amidst all the action and gadgets and women, got away with not knowing how to act... Daniel Craig breaks out... does his job brilliantly, feels for the ladies, and makes hearts flutter... all in the same movie!
Havent seen all Bond flicks, but the one starring Timothy Dalton is also very different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was scared to read what you have to say&#8230; I loved Casino Royale. I loved Daniel Craig. But mostly, I loved how for once Bond is made to look human.<br />
I noticed the lack of &#8220;silhouettes of sexy ladies dancing seductively in the opening credits&#8221;. Bond somehow, amidst all the action and gadgets and women, got away with not knowing how to act&#8230; Daniel Craig breaks out&#8230; does his job brilliantly, feels for the ladies, and makes hearts flutter&#8230; all in the same movie!<br />
Havent seen all Bond flicks, but the one starring Timothy Dalton is also very different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kausum</title>
		<link>http://greatbong.net/2006/11/19/the-bond-walks-again/#comment-54156</link>
		<dc:creator>kausum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 18:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatbong.net/2006/11/19/the-bond-walks-again/#comment-54156</guid>
		<description>My sentiments exactly after watching First Day Last Show. Although,  I have to admit, Bond girl with a swimsuit is a must for total paisa vasool. But overall a brilliant bond movie and a good adaptation of Ian Fleming&#039;s first novel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My sentiments exactly after watching First Day Last Show. Although,  I have to admit, Bond girl with a swimsuit is a must for total paisa vasool. But overall a brilliant bond movie and a good adaptation of Ian Fleming&#8217;s first novel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skdb</title>
		<link>http://greatbong.net/2006/11/19/the-bond-walks-again/#comment-53868</link>
		<dc:creator>skdb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatbong.net/2006/11/19/the-bond-walks-again/#comment-53868</guid>
		<description>no kidding.. this Bond edition stood apart in the fact that it actually had a good story!! None of the typical gizmos (the remote controlled BMW in Tomorrow Never Dies was a disappointment).... although it still pained me to see another Aston Martin get completely destroyed.

The last 20 minutes of the movie seemed like it was verging on being a chick-flick (with Bond&#039;s romantic overture &quot;...whatever is mine is yours&quot;) but they saved it nonethless!!

good movie and good review!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no kidding.. this Bond edition stood apart in the fact that it actually had a good story!! None of the typical gizmos (the remote controlled BMW in Tomorrow Never Dies was a disappointment)&#8230;. although it still pained me to see another Aston Martin get completely destroyed.</p>
<p>The last 20 minutes of the movie seemed like it was verging on being a chick-flick (with Bond&#8217;s romantic overture &#8220;&#8230;whatever is mine is yours&#8221;) but they saved it nonethless!!</p>
<p>good movie and good review!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swati</title>
		<link>http://greatbong.net/2006/11/19/the-bond-walks-again/#comment-53830</link>
		<dc:creator>swati</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 19:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatbong.net/2006/11/19/the-bond-walks-again/#comment-53830</guid>
		<description>Say what you will.
In our town of Barrackpore-am-Eisenbahn, there are no takers for this Bond. Not even at the modest price of Rs 25 per posterior on a seat.
My daughter (fountain of wisdom, aged 11) explained why. It seems that the censors have been at work and so the hormonally-high janata has found better use for their money.(&#039;Chines Jawani&#039; at Sandhya 10:30 am, &#039;L.A. Girl&#039; at Mina 8:30 pm)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Say what you will.<br />
In our town of Barrackpore-am-Eisenbahn, there are no takers for this Bond. Not even at the modest price of Rs 25 per posterior on a seat.<br />
My daughter (fountain of wisdom, aged 11) explained why. It seems that the censors have been at work and so the hormonally-high janata has found better use for their money.(&#8216;Chines Jawani&#8217; at Sandhya 10:30 am, &#8216;L.A. Girl&#8217; at Mina 8:30 pm)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S.Pyne</title>
		<link>http://greatbong.net/2006/11/19/the-bond-walks-again/#comment-53805</link>
		<dc:creator>S.Pyne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatbong.net/2006/11/19/the-bond-walks-again/#comment-53805</guid>
		<description>This is, in my opinion, your best review since da Vinci code (which was an excellent review): well-analyzed, broad yet detailed (e.g. the credits), and intelligent; better than high-handed rubbishing (KANK) or patronizing back-pat (Don) meant for enlightening the plebian gaon-wale. Great job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is, in my opinion, your best review since da Vinci code (which was an excellent review): well-analyzed, broad yet detailed (e.g. the credits), and intelligent; better than high-handed rubbishing (KANK) or patronizing back-pat (Don) meant for enlightening the plebian gaon-wale. Great job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/3 queries in 0.001 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 326/327 objects using disk: basic

Served from: greatbong.net @ 2012-05-23 14:41:44 -->
