Comments on: Mutter With Megha http://greatbong.net/2007/03/30/mutter-with-megha/ Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:38:22 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1 By: Krishanu http://greatbong.net/2007/03/30/mutter-with-megha/#comment-193101 Krishanu Thu, 05 Apr 2007 23:47:41 +0000 http://greatbong.net/2007/03/30/mutter-with-megha/#comment-193101 You won ! Congrats !!! (I was out for quite a long time) Was this a joint collaboration between you and Megha ? You won ! Congrats !!!

(I was out for quite a long time)

Was this a joint collaboration between you and Megha ?

]]> By: raj http://greatbong.net/2007/03/30/mutter-with-megha/#comment-192645 raj Thu, 05 Apr 2007 12:57:40 +0000 http://greatbong.net/2007/03/30/mutter-with-megha/#comment-192645 Ordinary post. Over hyped Indian cricketers? How about over-hyped indiblogger of the year? Granted that nobody does humour so well oftener but that oftener is the key word here. Checkout www.bosey.co.in for some really high-class humour. That would loe out to greatbong.net only because of the lack of prolificity. Ordinary post. Over hyped Indian cricketers? How about over-hyped indiblogger of the year?
Granted that nobody does humour so well oftener but that oftener is the key word here. Checkout
http://www.bosey.co.in for some really high-class humour. That would loe out to greatbong.net only because of the lack of prolificity.

]]> By: sameera http://greatbong.net/2007/03/30/mutter-with-megha/#comment-191119 sameera Wed, 04 Apr 2007 04:50:45 +0000 http://greatbong.net/2007/03/30/mutter-with-megha/#comment-191119 nice post and wow @ur googlepages! brainy geeky damn funny family man :) does that sum u up? nice post

and wow @ur googlepages!

brainy geeky damn funny family man :)
does that sum u up?

]]> By: varsha http://greatbong.net/2007/03/30/mutter-with-megha/#comment-189613 varsha Mon, 02 Apr 2007 11:52:27 +0000 http://greatbong.net/2007/03/30/mutter-with-megha/#comment-189613 @ kishor: gosh u r so focussed!!!!! @ kishor: gosh u r so focussed!!!!!

]]> By: greatbong http://greatbong.net/2007/03/30/mutter-with-megha/#comment-188996 greatbong Mon, 02 Apr 2007 01:20:38 +0000 http://greatbong.net/2007/03/30/mutter-with-megha/#comment-188996 @Vanessa: One is a trackback which is at the very bottom of the comments section. @Amit: Thank you for fanning my so-called megalomania. @RK: :-) @Gangadhar: But sir...I am so much part of the blue billion..so allow me my obsessions. @Pchakra: Closet?Since you have so adroitly gauged my megalomania, how can I be in the closet? @Sudipta: I should mention...this was written by both Megha and I. So credits if any is to both. @Joy Forever: 1) Guy in the picture is Jackie Chan 2) He was just trying to pretend he is SRK. @Kailas: :-) @Somsuj: :-) @Varsha: You cannot see Jackie Chan and Simi Garewal? @Kishor: "I suggest u blog twice daily and allocate the rest of ur time to ur family." Blog twice daily ! And you think I would have any time left to even brush my teeth ! @Asterix ::-) @Raj: Yes paapi pet ka sawaal as they say. @Swati: Professional picture...suit boot and constipated look. And yes my collaborators are all aware of my blogging activities. @Divya: Aah. @Amit Varma: Thank you ! @Yourfan: Aah well caught. However when I replied to that question, what I thought was "Had I ever not written anything based on the possibility of adverse reader reaction?" And the answer was No. Yes at one point of time, I was loathe to write about the Domestic Violence Act but due to your encouragement I did write about it. Now with regards to the Supreme Court judgement, had seen it and had thought of that comment thread then itself. @Rima: Thanks @Bhopale: As in "Tum to dhonkebaaz ho, waada karke bhool jaate ho" types? @Toe Knee: It would be tough to get me to look like Jackie Chan. Or John Abraham. @Tarzan: Welcome @Rishi: Ahem. @Sang.Froid: No not really. I am pretty trenchant in my views. :-). What often does happen is that on reflection, I feel that so-and-so point in the post could have been better made. @Indranil: Sigh. @Kallu: Yes thank you. @JAP: Yea duh-ling...when we meet at the kitty party in May we shall share our kitties. @Vanessa: One is a trackback which is at the very bottom of the comments section.

@Amit: Thank you for fanning my so-called megalomania.

@RK: :-)

@Gangadhar: But sir…I am so much part of the blue billion..so allow me my obsessions.

@Pchakra: Closet?Since you have so adroitly gauged my megalomania, how can I be in the closet?

@Sudipta: I should mention…this was written by both Megha and I. So credits if any is to both.

@Joy Forever: 1) Guy in the picture is Jackie Chan
2) He was just trying to pretend he is SRK.

@Kailas: :-)

@Somsuj: :-)

@Varsha: You cannot see Jackie Chan and Simi Garewal?

@Kishor:

“I suggest u blog twice daily and allocate the rest of ur time to ur family.”

Blog twice daily ! And you think I would have any time left to even brush my teeth !

@Asterix ::-)

@Raj: Yes paapi pet ka sawaal as they say.

@Swati: Professional picture…suit boot and constipated look. And yes my collaborators are all aware of my blogging activities.

@Divya: Aah.

@Amit Varma: Thank you !

@Yourfan: Aah well caught. However when I replied to that question, what I thought was “Had I ever not written anything based on the possibility of adverse reader reaction?” And the answer was No. Yes at one point of time, I was loathe to write about the Domestic Violence Act but due to your encouragement I did write about it.

Now with regards to the Supreme Court judgement, had seen it and had thought of that comment thread then itself.

@Rima: Thanks

@Bhopale: As in “Tum to dhonkebaaz ho, waada karke bhool jaate ho” types?

@Toe Knee: It would be tough to get me to look like Jackie Chan. Or John Abraham.

@Tarzan: Welcome

@Rishi: Ahem.

@Sang.Froid: No not really. I am pretty trenchant in my views. :-) . What often does happen is that on reflection, I feel that so-and-so point in the post could have been better made.

@Indranil: Sigh.

@Kallu: Yes thank you.

@JAP: Yea duh-ling…when we meet at the kitty party in May we shall share our kitties.

]]> By: J. Alfred Prufrock http://greatbong.net/2007/03/30/mutter-with-megha/#comment-187956 J. Alfred Prufrock Sun, 01 Apr 2007 05:26:55 +0000 http://greatbong.net/2007/03/30/mutter-with-megha/#comment-187956 Oooh durrling, you must share your hamper with me! J.A.P. Oooh durrling, you must share your hamper with me!

J.A.P.

]]> By: anon http://greatbong.net/2007/03/30/mutter-with-megha/#comment-187603 anon Sat, 31 Mar 2007 19:57:12 +0000 http://greatbong.net/2007/03/30/mutter-with-megha/#comment-187603 Yourfan writes: @kallu: r u emulating your brother lallu who seeks sensation all the time? well u are quite good at it without even trying!!!!! Yourfan writes:
@kallu: r u emulating your brother lallu who seeks sensation all the time? well u are quite good at it without even trying!!!!!

]]> By: kallu http://greatbong.net/2007/03/30/mutter-with-megha/#comment-187589 kallu Sat, 31 Mar 2007 19:15:59 +0000 http://greatbong.net/2007/03/30/mutter-with-megha/#comment-187589 Bakwas! A seriously shitty blog entry. Bakwas! A seriously shitty blog entry.

]]> By: Indranil http://greatbong.net/2007/03/30/mutter-with-megha/#comment-187047 Indranil Sat, 31 Mar 2007 07:36:41 +0000 http://greatbong.net/2007/03/30/mutter-with-megha/#comment-187047 nice one, as always...! btw, i do agree with swati...aaaaaaaaawful pix !!! nice one, as always…!
btw, i do agree with swati…aaaaaaaaawful pix !!!

]]> By: sang.froid http://greatbong.net/2007/03/30/mutter-with-megha/#comment-186986 sang.froid Sat, 31 Mar 2007 06:26:10 +0000 http://greatbong.net/2007/03/30/mutter-with-megha/#comment-186986 i loved the part where you look to the side every now and then! :) that was soo KwK. i love how these small details are singled out! you mentioned that readers don't influence your posts and you always write only about something you feel you need to express... my question is: after you read the comments ( i mean ALL KINDS of comments) that you recieve on a particular post, does it or has it at any point changed your opinion on that particular post. what i mean to say is that the initial thought and point of view that you started off with while writing a post, has it ever changed after reading particular comments from ppl? i loved the part where you look to the side every now and then! :)
that was soo KwK. i love how these small details are singled out!

you mentioned that readers don’t influence your posts and you always write only about something you feel you need to express… my question is: after you read the comments ( i mean ALL KINDS of comments) that you recieve on a particular post, does it or has it at any point changed your opinion on that particular post. what i mean to say is that the initial thought and point of view that you started off with while writing a post, has it ever changed after reading particular comments from ppl?

]]>