<?xml version="1.0" encoding=""?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Seen This Fashion Bomb?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://greatbong.net/2007/08/29/seen-this-fashion-bomb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://greatbong.net/2007/08/29/seen-this-fashion-bomb/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 17:08:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: would like to play nltexasholdem for free on the net</title>
		<link>http://greatbong.net/2007/08/29/seen-this-fashion-bomb/#comment-654984</link>
		<dc:creator>would like to play nltexasholdem for free on the net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 03:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatbong.net/2007/08/29/seen-this-fashion-bomb/#comment-654984</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;would like to play nltexasholdem for free on the net...&lt;/strong&gt;

withholders?scolds jackknife unjustly,lithography Islamization,...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>would like to play nltexasholdem for free on the net&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>withholders?scolds jackknife unjustly,lithography Islamization,&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erebus</title>
		<link>http://greatbong.net/2007/08/29/seen-this-fashion-bomb/#comment-652591</link>
		<dc:creator>Erebus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatbong.net/2007/08/29/seen-this-fashion-bomb/#comment-652591</guid>
		<description>From the rediff article.
&quot; We made the sketch based on the description provided by an eye-witness ho had seen the suspected accused. The suspect was carrying a black bag,&quot; the additional CP said.&quot;

LMAO- Eye witness ho.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the rediff article.<br />
&#8221; We made the sketch based on the description provided by an eye-witness ho had seen the suspected accused. The suspect was carrying a black bag,&#8221; the additional CP said.&#8221;</p>
<p>LMAO- Eye witness ho.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: las vegas usa casino bonus code</title>
		<link>http://greatbong.net/2007/08/29/seen-this-fashion-bomb/#comment-618933</link>
		<dc:creator>las vegas usa casino bonus code</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 08:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatbong.net/2007/08/29/seen-this-fashion-bomb/#comment-618933</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;las vegas usa casino bonus code...&lt;/strong&gt;

consummately possessions,belittles Paynes inhibit concentrators ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>las vegas usa casino bonus code&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>consummately possessions,belittles Paynes inhibit concentrators &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sunny</title>
		<link>http://greatbong.net/2007/08/29/seen-this-fashion-bomb/#comment-346418</link>
		<dc:creator>sunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 08:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatbong.net/2007/08/29/seen-this-fashion-bomb/#comment-346418</guid>
		<description>or better provided a pass to whorehouse certified 100% hiv+!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>or better provided a pass to whorehouse certified 100% hiv+!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sunny</title>
		<link>http://greatbong.net/2007/08/29/seen-this-fashion-bomb/#comment-346416</link>
		<dc:creator>sunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 08:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatbong.net/2007/08/29/seen-this-fashion-bomb/#comment-346416</guid>
		<description>circulate a fake job hunt for such idiots and who  agrees readily should be eiminated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>circulate a fake job hunt for such idiots and who  agrees readily should be eiminated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hujur</title>
		<link>http://greatbong.net/2007/08/29/seen-this-fashion-bomb/#comment-338363</link>
		<dc:creator>Hujur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 15:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatbong.net/2007/08/29/seen-this-fashion-bomb/#comment-338363</guid>
		<description>Dear Hara Hara Bom Bom,

I would be delighted to brainstorm and fine-tune some S.M.A.R.T. goals (for on-going grass-roots work in W.Bengal) with you. 

Please send me a blank email at: Porus_Rex(AT)yahoo.com so I can share the details with you.

-Hujur</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Hara Hara Bom Bom,</p>
<p>I would be delighted to brainstorm and fine-tune some S.M.A.R.T. goals (for on-going grass-roots work in W.Bengal) with you. </p>
<p>Please send me a blank email at: Porus_Rex(AT)yahoo.com so I can share the details with you.</p>
<p>-Hujur</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hujur</title>
		<link>http://greatbong.net/2007/08/29/seen-this-fashion-bomb/#comment-338354</link>
		<dc:creator>Hujur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 15:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatbong.net/2007/08/29/seen-this-fashion-bomb/#comment-338354</guid>
		<description>Dear Tarzan,

In the very second post, you wrote, referring to the Islamic “fashion-bomb”: “Yeah man… you must have got some good money for this..”

My take:
These brave “religious warriors” don’t wage Jihad on Kafirs for monetary rewards in this life. 
These Mujahids slaughter Kafirs because the Qu’ran explicitly promises sexual rewards in the after-life (with 72 virgins in heaven).
In a nutshell … For killing non-believers, true “believers” don’t get paid, they get laid.


- Hujur</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Tarzan,</p>
<p>In the very second post, you wrote, referring to the Islamic “fashion-bomb”: “Yeah man… you must have got some good money for this..”</p>
<p>My take:<br />
These brave “religious warriors” don’t wage Jihad on Kafirs for monetary rewards in this life.<br />
These Mujahids slaughter Kafirs because the Qu’ran explicitly promises sexual rewards in the after-life (with 72 virgins in heaven).<br />
In a nutshell … For killing non-believers, true “believers” don’t get paid, they get laid.</p>
<p>- Hujur</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rishi khujur</title>
		<link>http://greatbong.net/2007/08/29/seen-this-fashion-bomb/#comment-337744</link>
		<dc:creator>rishi khujur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 21:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatbong.net/2007/08/29/seen-this-fashion-bomb/#comment-337744</guid>
		<description>@ HHBB
amake ekta email likho...rishi_khujur@rediffmail.com
Tomaar shonge onek kichu discuss koraar aache.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ HHBB<br />
amake ekta email <a href="mailto:likho...rishi_khujur@rediffmail.com">likho&#8230;rishi_khujur@rediffmail.com</a><br />
Tomaar shonge onek kichu discuss koraar aache.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rishi khujur</title>
		<link>http://greatbong.net/2007/08/29/seen-this-fashion-bomb/#comment-337731</link>
		<dc:creator>rishi khujur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 20:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatbong.net/2007/08/29/seen-this-fashion-bomb/#comment-337731</guid>
		<description>@ HHBB
Very good points.
But it cannot be denied that post Islamic agression, Bhakti became an important tool for the sustenance of Hindu Dharma, because of the strong and agressive approach of Islamic rulers and the new converts towards existing organised classical Hinduism.

Actually Sufism has little to do with spirituality in itself. Most of the spirituality aspect of Sufism was brough into it by new and native converts from Hinduism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ HHBB<br />
Very good points.<br />
But it cannot be denied that post Islamic agression, Bhakti became an important tool for the sustenance of Hindu Dharma, because of the strong and agressive approach of Islamic rulers and the new converts towards existing organised classical Hinduism.</p>
<p>Actually Sufism has little to do with spirituality in itself. Most of the spirituality aspect of Sufism was brough into it by new and native converts from Hinduism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hara hara bom bom</title>
		<link>http://greatbong.net/2007/08/29/seen-this-fashion-bomb/#comment-337613</link>
		<dc:creator>Hara hara bom bom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 18:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatbong.net/2007/08/29/seen-this-fashion-bomb/#comment-337613</guid>
		<description>@ rishi khujur : &quot;The Hindus responded with the rustic Bhakti Movement as a effective counter-strategy&quot;

Hi Rishi.  I do not agree with the view that Bhakti arose as a counter-strategy to combat Sufism.  IMHO, that is a view propagated by :

(a) Western historians who wish to portray Hinduism as passive &amp; reactive. As if &#039;cunning Brahmins&#039; devised Bhakti only as a &#039;response&#039; to a dynamic Islamic force. i.e Hindus could not devise a liberal movement for its own sake.

(b) Islamic/st historians &#039;of India&#039;, who wish to attribute everything good in India to Islam. A Pak journalist even suggested that the reason Banglaore is so prosperous is because it once had a Mulsim ruler, Tipu Sultan !!!) :-)  So even if a &#039;good&#039; movement is not Islamic, it arose as a &#039;response&#039; to Islam, so Islam can take credit for it anyway !!

The mass Bhakti movement in Bengal (Nama Sankirtan) arose in the 15th century.  Yet Bhakti is clearly outlined in far earlier works :
(a) The Geeta - 1st century AD (at latest)
(b) Alvars of South India (5th - 8th century AD)
(c) Bhagavata Purana (9th century at latest)
(d) Narada Bhakti Sutra (12th century at latest)

(b) &amp; (c) enjoyed great popularity at grass root levels. Whereas Sufism, even at a spiritual level (ie discounting its subversive historical employment), is an esoteric religion which would have little appeal for the masses.  Thus Muslim bauls of Bengal are more like Hindu icon-worshippers rather than vice versa, &amp; Qawwali did not become all the rage.

Muslims claim that Islam spread through Sufism, but that may be to deny that the true causes were less metaphysical, jehad &amp; jizzya.

The strong roots for Bhakti were always present in Bengal.  It was the personal magnetism of Chaitanya that spread it like wildfire.

A bit like Swami Ramadeva &amp; Pranayama.  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ rishi khujur : &#8220;The Hindus responded with the rustic Bhakti Movement as a effective counter-strategy&#8221;</p>
<p>Hi Rishi.  I do not agree with the view that Bhakti arose as a counter-strategy to combat Sufism.  IMHO, that is a view propagated by :</p>
<p>(a) Western historians who wish to portray Hinduism as passive &amp; reactive. As if &#8216;cunning Brahmins&#8217; devised Bhakti only as a &#8216;response&#8217; to a dynamic Islamic force. i.e Hindus could not devise a liberal movement for its own sake.</p>
<p>(b) Islamic/st historians &#8216;of India&#8217;, who wish to attribute everything good in India to Islam. A Pak journalist even suggested that the reason Banglaore is so prosperous is because it once had a Mulsim ruler, Tipu Sultan !!!) <img src='http://greatbong.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />   So even if a &#8216;good&#8217; movement is not Islamic, it arose as a &#8216;response&#8217; to Islam, so Islam can take credit for it anyway !!</p>
<p>The mass Bhakti movement in Bengal (Nama Sankirtan) arose in the 15th century.  Yet Bhakti is clearly outlined in far earlier works :<br />
(a) The Geeta &#8211; 1st century AD (at latest)<br />
(b) Alvars of South India (5th &#8211; 8th century AD)<br />
(c) Bhagavata Purana (9th century at latest)<br />
(d) Narada Bhakti Sutra (12th century at latest)</p>
<p>(b) &amp; (c) enjoyed great popularity at grass root levels. Whereas Sufism, even at a spiritual level (ie discounting its subversive historical employment), is an esoteric religion which would have little appeal for the masses.  Thus Muslim bauls of Bengal are more like Hindu icon-worshippers rather than vice versa, &amp; Qawwali did not become all the rage.</p>
<p>Muslims claim that Islam spread through Sufism, but that may be to deny that the true causes were less metaphysical, jehad &amp; jizzya.</p>
<p>The strong roots for Bhakti were always present in Bengal.  It was the personal magnetism of Chaitanya that spread it like wildfire.</p>
<p>A bit like Swami Ramadeva &amp; Pranayama.  <img src='http://greatbong.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/3 queries in 0.001 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 330/331 objects using disk: basic

Served from: greatbong.net @ 2012-05-23 22:23:28 -->
