Comments on: Mushu Mushu Hasi

By: The disquiet on the western front « A Bend in the Road

The disquiet on the western front « A Bend in the Road — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 12:44:52 +0000

[...] For a more light-hearted rant check out this. [...]

By: Dibyo

Dibyo — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 18:38:08 +0000

I think Mushy will blame Benazir and Imran if Pak loose the series. Maybe arrest Malik and Younuis Khan for the loss.

By: yourfan2

yourfan2 — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 17:33:43 +0000

Hmm…In a few words- Trying to act like Big Brother and perhaps inspired by another Big Brother.
http://www.dawn.com/2007/11/07/top17.htm

Looks like Pakistanis around the world are a under a lot of duress.:)
Time for Dhoni and co to pile on the misery.

By: Dibyo

Dibyo — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 16:43:45 +0000

In the name of restoring democracy and fighting against extremism, Mushy has adopted a form of extremism himself. Instead of military action against militants his security forces have ben more busy arresting moderate activists in Pak. What’s going on here , is he stupid, is he confused or is he simply a devil ?

By: Chatterji

Chatterji — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 14:26:09 +0000

@Anonymous,

So what could India have done to revert it? Mush was the only chap in Pakistan we could deal with. The only way (the US way) to really protest against a country’s leadership is to attack it and no thanks… the Indian Army is not a suicide squad. Even the US cannot enter Paki territory.

As if blaming India for all her own problems was not enough, we suddenly are to blame for the lack of democracy in Pakistan as well!

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 09:07:12 +0000

“Or will this mark the beginning of the end of Pakistan as a state —the deadly trigger that leads to a nuclear device/material falling into the hands of the mad Jihadis—–the free world’s worst nightmare?”

Well we only have India and USA to blame for this. They knew all along that it was coming but didn’t do anything to revert it. They keep on supporting General and his man. While US policy can still be justified as they considered Mush an ally for war against terror, but what could explain India’s passivity, knowing that the general was the key architect of Kargil adventure.

By: kishor

kishor — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 06:16:00 +0000

good one…….

By: swati

swati — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 06:13:46 +0000

nice post……..

By: yaahooo

yaahooo — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 00:22:12 +0000

Mus is wretched man.

War criminal 4 kargil. Has done nothing 2 save remaining few Hindus in Pak from perseqtion. Gave open refuge to Daud Ib. Cruel to Baloch. How can US assoc8 with such a villain?

Ind can never trust US, who botch Angola, Siera Leon, Chile & Iraq (Afghan action was ok). Even few weeks ago US insult Burma, but is so hypocritical that few weeks l8tr continues to fund total fuhror like Mus.

US wud rather help China than India. We Indians r really on r own.

By: Sanjay

Sanjay — Tue, 06 Nov 2007 18:35:22 +0000

I dont think Musharraf had any choice. I am not a fan of dictatorship but if your alternatives are Benazir and Nawaz then I would take the Army anyday. One must not forget that Pakistan ,during the elected democracy of Benazir and Nawaz, was not free, not secular. There was no freedom of press, no freedom of expression for people of Pakistan during the democratically elected regimes between Zia and Musharraf’s army rule.

Musharraf is not Zia, he didn’t want power, he had to take the power to stay alive. He doesn’t want to radically Islamicise Pakistan nor does he want to plunder Pakistani wealth (atleast it is not in public domain yet).