<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Press Coverage of 26/11&#8212;Some Thoughts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://greatbong.net/2008/12/10/press-coverage-of-2611-some-thoughts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://greatbong.net/2008/12/10/press-coverage-of-2611-some-thoughts/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:38:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bengal Voice</title>
		<link>http://greatbong.net/2008/12/10/press-coverage-of-2611-some-thoughts/#comment-677898</link>
		<dc:creator>Bengal Voice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatbong.net/2008/12/10/press-coverage-of-2611-some-thoughts/#comment-677898</guid>
		<description>Hi yourfan2,

Thanks for the interesting article&#039;s link from NY Post. In this article, Ralph Peters makes a chilling observation: 

&quot;What causes do these terrorists represent? Their name, Deccan Mujahedeen, captures their vision: an India once again under Muslim rule.

To us, this seems an absurd, impossible goal, as mad as al Qaeda&#039;s dream of a global caliphate. We&#039;re dealing with sometimes brilliant operators, but we&#039;re also facing dreamers whose visions are irrational by our standards.

Madness and genius are not mutually exclusive. And rational goals don&#039;t attract suicide commandos.

For centuries, the Deccan plateau was a Muslim stronghold in central India, ruled by tyrants from mighty fortresses. The subcontinent&#039;s Islamist extremists believe that Muslims are entitled to rule India again.

They view the Deccan as Islam&#039;s dagger in India&#039;s Hindu heart.&quot;

I think Ralph Peters is just rehashing what is already well-known in Indian intelligence circles. Well, he must have read this report: 
&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bengalgenocide.com/mughalistan.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&#039;Pakistan-Bangladesh plan a Mughalistan to split India&#039;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi yourfan2,</p>
<p>Thanks for the interesting article&#8217;s link from NY Post. In this article, Ralph Peters makes a chilling observation: </p>
<p>&#8220;What causes do these terrorists represent? Their name, Deccan Mujahedeen, captures their vision: an India once again under Muslim rule.</p>
<p>To us, this seems an absurd, impossible goal, as mad as al Qaeda&#8217;s dream of a global caliphate. We&#8217;re dealing with sometimes brilliant operators, but we&#8217;re also facing dreamers whose visions are irrational by our standards.</p>
<p>Madness and genius are not mutually exclusive. And rational goals don&#8217;t attract suicide commandos.</p>
<p>For centuries, the Deccan plateau was a Muslim stronghold in central India, ruled by tyrants from mighty fortresses. The subcontinent&#8217;s Islamist extremists believe that Muslims are entitled to rule India again.</p>
<p>They view the Deccan as Islam&#8217;s dagger in India&#8217;s Hindu heart.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think Ralph Peters is just rehashing what is already well-known in Indian intelligence circles. Well, he must have read this report: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.bengalgenocide.com/mughalistan.php" rel="nofollow">&#8216;Pakistan-Bangladesh plan a Mughalistan to split India&#8217;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yourfan2</title>
		<link>http://greatbong.net/2008/12/10/press-coverage-of-2611-some-thoughts/#comment-677893</link>
		<dc:creator>yourfan2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatbong.net/2008/12/10/press-coverage-of-2611-some-thoughts/#comment-677893</guid>
		<description>http://www.fco.cat/files/imatges/Butlleti160/NYPost.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.fco.cat/files/imatges/Butlleti160/NYPost.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.fco.cat/files/imatges/Butlleti160/NYPost.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shan</title>
		<link>http://greatbong.net/2008/12/10/press-coverage-of-2611-some-thoughts/#comment-675715</link>
		<dc:creator>Shan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 07:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatbong.net/2008/12/10/press-coverage-of-2611-some-thoughts/#comment-675715</guid>
		<description>VP Singh? The bastard deserved his anonymous death. May he rot in hell!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VP Singh? The bastard deserved his anonymous death. May he rot in hell!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://greatbong.net/2008/12/10/press-coverage-of-2611-some-thoughts/#comment-675585</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 18:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatbong.net/2008/12/10/press-coverage-of-2611-some-thoughts/#comment-675585</guid>
		<description>Sagarika &#039;Ghose&#039;, not Ghosh :) Unless that was a truly emotional pun (think &quot;Gosh!&quot;) ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sagarika &#8216;Ghose&#8217;, not Ghosh <img src='http://greatbong.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Unless that was a truly emotional pun (think &#8220;Gosh!&#8221;) <img src='http://greatbong.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aditi</title>
		<link>http://greatbong.net/2008/12/10/press-coverage-of-2611-some-thoughts/#comment-675312</link>
		<dc:creator>Aditi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatbong.net/2008/12/10/press-coverage-of-2611-some-thoughts/#comment-675312</guid>
		<description>Why &quot;independent India&quot; in the last paragraph? Why not just India?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why &#8220;independent India&#8221; in the last paragraph? Why not just India?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://greatbong.net/2008/12/10/press-coverage-of-2611-some-thoughts/#comment-674130</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 23:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatbong.net/2008/12/10/press-coverage-of-2611-some-thoughts/#comment-674130</guid>
		<description>Yes I could be the blogger. I could be Salman Khan. I could be Obama. I could also be a close family member of another anonymous who rues a decision taken a long time ago. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I could be the blogger. I could be Salman Khan. I could be Obama. I could also be a close family member of another anonymous who rues a decision taken a long time ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://greatbong.net/2008/12/10/press-coverage-of-2611-some-thoughts/#comment-674124</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 22:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatbong.net/2008/12/10/press-coverage-of-2611-some-thoughts/#comment-674124</guid>
		<description>are you the blogger himself writing as anonymous ?? :O possible, fair critique must be hurting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>are you the blogger himself writing as anonymous ?? :O possible, fair critique must be hurting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: surya</title>
		<link>http://greatbong.net/2008/12/10/press-coverage-of-2611-some-thoughts/#comment-673938</link>
		<dc:creator>surya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 07:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatbong.net/2008/12/10/press-coverage-of-2611-some-thoughts/#comment-673938</guid>
		<description>Barkha did a short telephonic with Shantanu Saika, the husband of Sabeena Saika from TOI who was (then) missing (later declared dead)... it was a live thing and Shantanu broke down on the phone as she said, &quot;Shantanu, what are you telling your kids, at the moment? Its been 36 hrs and Sabeena is still missing.&quot; I thought, at least now, Shantanu would say, &quot;I dont want to talk to you...&quot; and bang the phone. Instead, after a few muffled sobs, he said, &quot;I am just giving them strength... not telling them anything at the moment...sob sob..&quot; And Barkha went on, &quot;Shantanu, have we upset you? We&#039;ll give you time... you can pour your heart out...we&#039;re praying&quot; etc.

You&#039;re right when you say that people themselves don&#039;t feel hesitant in going on air. Media has gone to the dogs. 

(ps- I am a journalist too with JAM magazine)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barkha did a short telephonic with Shantanu Saika, the husband of Sabeena Saika from TOI who was (then) missing (later declared dead)&#8230; it was a live thing and Shantanu broke down on the phone as she said, &#8220;Shantanu, what are you telling your kids, at the moment? Its been 36 hrs and Sabeena is still missing.&#8221; I thought, at least now, Shantanu would say, &#8220;I dont want to talk to you&#8230;&#8221; and bang the phone. Instead, after a few muffled sobs, he said, &#8220;I am just giving them strength&#8230; not telling them anything at the moment&#8230;sob sob..&#8221; And Barkha went on, &#8220;Shantanu, have we upset you? We&#8217;ll give you time&#8230; you can pour your heart out&#8230;we&#8217;re praying&#8221; etc.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right when you say that people themselves don&#8217;t feel hesitant in going on air. Media has gone to the dogs. </p>
<p>(ps- I am a journalist too with JAM magazine)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pankaj Roy</title>
		<link>http://greatbong.net/2008/12/10/press-coverage-of-2611-some-thoughts/#comment-673639</link>
		<dc:creator>Pankaj Roy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatbong.net/2008/12/10/press-coverage-of-2611-some-thoughts/#comment-673639</guid>
		<description>Ramesh Srivats, who I noticed had commented earlier here, has this exaspereted take on Indian TV coverage during the attacks - http://www.rameshsrivats.net/2008/11/it-would-be-funny-if-it-werent-scary.html

Well worth reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ramesh Srivats, who I noticed had commented earlier here, has this exaspereted take on Indian TV coverage during the attacks &#8211; <a href="http://www.rameshsrivats.net/2008/11/it-would-be-funny-if-it-werent-scary.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.rameshsrivats.net/2008/11/it-would-be-funny-if-it-werent-scary.html</a></p>
<p>Well worth reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://greatbong.net/2008/12/10/press-coverage-of-2611-some-thoughts/#comment-673622</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 21:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatbong.net/2008/12/10/press-coverage-of-2611-some-thoughts/#comment-673622</guid>
		<description>The fact that you couldnt get neither head nor tail of what I said is because your head is so far up your ass that it disorients you. As to you being respectful, I saw how respectful you were to the blogger whose blogspace you are writing in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that you couldnt get neither head nor tail of what I said is because your head is so far up your ass that it disorients you. As to you being respectful, I saw how respectful you were to the blogger whose blogspace you are writing in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: greatbong.net @ 2012-02-09 08:57:17 -->
