I just came across this song by a new band called Shor Bazaar. Its about savita bhabhi. As a tribute. Its hilarious. The lyric is out there. This is the band site http://bazaarshor.blogspot.com. Maybe you should write a post about the song.

Vij

I dont understand why media/Film makers is giving so much space to this topic.

This will only encourage same sex and bestiality experiments.

For example When MJ died and media covered this news. people googled abt him . Purchased music Cds, posters etc. So people reacts to news they consume.

In several cases of bestiality in west..the reason to do it was ..that they wanted to copy what they had seen over internet. They wanted to have fun .

So let the marginal guys n gals live in peace and just ignore them for the benefit of the society . They should not make a scene abt their sexuality in common places especially where children & adolecents are exposed.

I think that’s slightly harsh on Arnabda. His runs by far one of the better and more liberal blog-sites, giving us a lot of lassitude.

You see, Keshto, we cannot expect a 50:50 playing field. A millenia of tradition and experience means that both Hs and Ms are uncomfortable with a 50:50 scenario.

A Muslim believes himself to be God’s gift to mankind, literally. He believes in a 100:0 scenario vis a vis Hindus. A Hindu on the other hand, because of an ingrained defeat complex, is always willing to cede more to the other party to remain in their good books out of fear of unintended slight. Thus a H is happier with a 65:35 scenario (i.e he receives 35) rather than a 50:50 scenario.

This is evident in the media, in our interaction with others, business deals etc. And because of this status quo, any attempt by Hs to raise the 65:35 to 50:50 will be frowned upon, both by Hs and Ms.

Arnabda is far, far better than the 65:35 equation and I thank him for that. And this is from someone who has had numerous posts deleted!! The number of times I’ve spent hours typing up a nice report (lnks between Nazism & Islam, genocide of Armenians, the deterioration of the racial balance in Australia, etc etc etc), seen it appear on the blogsite with satisfaction, only to wallow in despair a few minutes later when it has been ruthlessly removed …. aaaargggh.

And even so, I say Arnabda is quite liberal and tries to retain posts that are relevant and non-offensive.

There is opportunity for him to be ‘more’ liberal though!!

Even a Nationalist like Arnab, who otherwise tries to be fair and balanced, would have deleted a post from Hujur, that lets say, calls Nizamuddin Aulia as Nizamuddin Bakri Aulia.

Is this double standard, inadvertant, or is there latent fear that almost has goten embedded into the Kafir and Dhimmi mindset?

PS: Arnab you can delete this post becasue it was meant for you to read.

Yes I know this. My issue was your dragging Ramdevji thru’ the mire in your efforts to express your disapproval… Duh square !!

@joyjit: And just by adding a derogatory word in my name, you can serve no purpose. I don’t even care.

That’s fine for non-entities like you and me. But we should treat Ramdevji, a person who has done so much good, selflessly, freely and boundlessly, for millions of people who had lost hope, with a lot more respect.

Heck,if Ramdevji were a Christian, he would have been given the Noble Peace by now. If he were a Muslim, he would have received the Nobel Peace Prize by now … twice.

@joyjit: And the best part is that you have brought Pakistan into a debate out of no where for god knows what reason.

It was because you had branded Indians as unfailing hypocrites. I don’t think you know what real hypocrisy is, so I tried to enlighten.

You should give credit where credit is due. This has been a landmark judgement for India. For a society steeped in tradition, a development as profound, far-reaching and radical as this acts as an acid test of the liberality of the belief-system nurturing it. The fact that this has passed without a single flutter so far, is irrefutable proof the innate liberalism, plurality and tolerance of India and its Hindu backdrop.

@joyjit: The reason for mentioning ‘Bruno’ was because …. it would be really interesting to see him interact with someone who thinks homo sexuality is a ‘disease’

You had said “I would like to see Bruno ‘do’ Ramdev”. Do you know what this implies? The last time you heard your mate saying “Oh, her? I’ve already done her”, you can be very sure he not talking about taking minutes of an interview on a notepad.

Be a bit more careful about terms and how they can be misinterpreted. Or perhaps you are just playing at innocence like a soggy moggy (Bengali term)!!

The irony is, Joyjit, I agree with you. I find Ramdevji’s comments extremely distasteful. But this is an observation which will have no tangible effect on the future of HM in India. However, the immense good that he is doing, will confer solid, tangible and monumental benefits to India. So treat him with more respect please.

And just by adding a derogatory word in my name, you can serve no purpose. I don’t even care…

And the best part is that you have brought pakistan into a debate out of no where for god knows what reason. And the reason for mentioning ‘Bruno’ was because the whole movie is to bring out the homophobic tendencies in people and it would be really interesting to see him interact with someone who thinks homo sexuality is a ‘disease’ which can be cured with his ‘demi god miracles’…