<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why I Oppose The Ban On The Veil</title>
	<atom:link href="http://greatbong.net/2010/07/14/why-i-oppose-the-ban-on-the-veil/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://greatbong.net/2010/07/14/why-i-oppose-the-ban-on-the-veil/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:38:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: D</title>
		<link>http://greatbong.net/2010/07/14/why-i-oppose-the-ban-on-the-veil/#comment-929933</link>
		<dc:creator>D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 21:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatbong.net/?p=11944#comment-929933</guid>
		<description>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A3YQANdvvbY&amp;feature=player_embedded#at=269</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A3YQANdvvbY&#038;feature=player_embedded#at=269" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A3YQANdvvbY&#038;feature=player_embedded#at=269</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sanket</title>
		<link>http://greatbong.net/2010/07/14/why-i-oppose-the-ban-on-the-veil/#comment-869184</link>
		<dc:creator>Sanket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 19:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatbong.net/?p=11944#comment-869184</guid>
		<description>Well has there anyone who came and said they wanted to be burnt alive? No. It doesnt happen because self-preservation is a basic human instinct.
------
Millions of people voluntarily sign for military duty knowing it is risky. Do they have no sense of self-preservation? If one glances at the history and looks at WW1 and WW2, one can see that hundreds of thousands of young man had voluntarily sacrificed their lives. So what is the problem in accepting that during the 2,000 year old history of India some 8,000 woman (stats from Wikipedia) wanted to be burnt alive. As being a Sati was a matter of glory, the statistics are probably overstates.

The Sati became a goddess. Through death she attained divinity. It was believed that through the act of being Sati, a woman ensured that 7 generations of her family and her  husband&#039;s family went to heaven.

Given such a background, is it a wonder that some woman became Sati voluntarily? Is bravery only confined to Western man not Indian woman?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well has there anyone who came and said they wanted to be burnt alive? No. It doesnt happen because self-preservation is a basic human instinct.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;<br />
Millions of people voluntarily sign for military duty knowing it is risky. Do they have no sense of self-preservation? If one glances at the history and looks at WW1 and WW2, one can see that hundreds of thousands of young man had voluntarily sacrificed their lives. So what is the problem in accepting that during the 2,000 year old history of India some 8,000 woman (stats from Wikipedia) wanted to be burnt alive. As being a Sati was a matter of glory, the statistics are probably overstates.</p>
<p>The Sati became a goddess. Through death she attained divinity. It was believed that through the act of being Sati, a woman ensured that 7 generations of her family and her  husband&#8217;s family went to heaven.</p>
<p>Given such a background, is it a wonder that some woman became Sati voluntarily? Is bravery only confined to Western man not Indian woman?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://greatbong.net/2010/07/14/why-i-oppose-the-ban-on-the-veil/#comment-858978</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2010 11:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatbong.net/?p=11944#comment-858978</guid>
		<description>The reasons purported by the French government for the ban do go against the ethos of a free society, however the Burqa should be banned because it is a legitimate security threat. Even Syria, a Muslim country, has implemented a ban on it (or at least are discussing the possibility) in certain spheres of public life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reasons purported by the French government for the ban do go against the ethos of a free society, however the Burqa should be banned because it is a legitimate security threat. Even Syria, a Muslim country, has implemented a ban on it (or at least are discussing the possibility) in certain spheres of public life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amit Choudhury</title>
		<link>http://greatbong.net/2010/07/14/why-i-oppose-the-ban-on-the-veil/#comment-853545</link>
		<dc:creator>Amit Choudhury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 06:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatbong.net/?p=11944#comment-853545</guid>
		<description>Let me put it this way,I wouldnt board a flight if a couple of unidentified burkha clad women got on too, or for that matter some burly sword and kirpan carrying Sikhs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me put it this way,I wouldnt board a flight if a couple of unidentified burkha clad women got on too, or for that matter some burly sword and kirpan carrying Sikhs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bengal Voice</title>
		<link>http://greatbong.net/2010/07/14/why-i-oppose-the-ban-on-the-veil/#comment-849393</link>
		<dc:creator>Bengal Voice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 18:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatbong.net/?p=11944#comment-849393</guid>
		<description>OMG. Somebody stop the French...Their proposed law is going to hurt the feelings of polygamists. 

&lt;b&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.rediff.com/report/2010/aug/09/after-burqa-france-plans-to-ban-polygamy.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;After burqa, France plans to ban polygamy&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG. Somebody stop the French&#8230;Their proposed law is going to hurt the feelings of polygamists. </p>
<p><b><br />
<a href="http://news.rediff.com/report/2010/aug/09/after-burqa-france-plans-to-ban-polygamy.htm" rel="nofollow">After burqa, France plans to ban polygamy</a></b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bengal Voice</title>
		<link>http://greatbong.net/2010/07/14/why-i-oppose-the-ban-on-the-veil/#comment-848846</link>
		<dc:creator>Bengal Voice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 15:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatbong.net/?p=11944#comment-848846</guid>
		<description>It looks like the Brits are catching on.... What in the world is going on? 
&lt;b&gt;
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/aug/02/poll-islam-negative-britain
&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like the Brits are catching on&#8230;. What in the world is going on?<br />
<b><br />
<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/aug/02/poll-islam-negative-britain" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/aug/02/poll-islam-negative-britain</a><br />
</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avik Gupta</title>
		<link>http://greatbong.net/2010/07/14/why-i-oppose-the-ban-on-the-veil/#comment-848604</link>
		<dc:creator>Avik Gupta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 06:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatbong.net/?p=11944#comment-848604</guid>
		<description>Interesting, but a little naive i felt (unlike the usual posts), to take such a strong stand. I&#039;ve been reading The Argumentative Indian by Amartya Sen where he did happen to mention the French ban. I, myself, do not know a lot about it, but felt what he had written made sense. The western idea of secularism is quite different from India&#039;s. In India secularism means treating all religions at par, whereas in the West it means that the state does not favour any religion in particular. Considering this it does make sense for the french to ban the Burqa( although I do not personally see the need for it ). Also, as many people have pointed out before, and endorsed by Dr. Sen, many girls do it not just out of free will but out of pressure from their families and other reasons, but yes, that does need to be investigated before taking such a strong step. But yes, after reading this post I did realise the rather obvious reason for the govt&#039;s decision, since it is a sure shot way of pleasing the locals who post 9/11 have become skeptical about anything islamic. 

P.S. NO OFFENSE TO ANYONE (people are very eager to get offended these days)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, but a little naive i felt (unlike the usual posts), to take such a strong stand. I&#8217;ve been reading The Argumentative Indian by Amartya Sen where he did happen to mention the French ban. I, myself, do not know a lot about it, but felt what he had written made sense. The western idea of secularism is quite different from India&#8217;s. In India secularism means treating all religions at par, whereas in the West it means that the state does not favour any religion in particular. Considering this it does make sense for the french to ban the Burqa( although I do not personally see the need for it ). Also, as many people have pointed out before, and endorsed by Dr. Sen, many girls do it not just out of free will but out of pressure from their families and other reasons, but yes, that does need to be investigated before taking such a strong step. But yes, after reading this post I did realise the rather obvious reason for the govt&#8217;s decision, since it is a sure shot way of pleasing the locals who post 9/11 have become skeptical about anything islamic. </p>
<p>P.S. NO OFFENSE TO ANYONE (people are very eager to get offended these days)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ankit Poddar</title>
		<link>http://greatbong.net/2010/07/14/why-i-oppose-the-ban-on-the-veil/#comment-848432</link>
		<dc:creator>Ankit Poddar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 05:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatbong.net/?p=11944#comment-848432</guid>
		<description>@Justice

You got involved first in the discussion about the analogy extended by Rishi Khujur.

You better not blame me for diverting the discussion. 

And do not get carried away and do not call me a moron. Kindly exhibit some sense of mutual respect and decorum in a discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Justice</p>
<p>You got involved first in the discussion about the analogy extended by Rishi Khujur.</p>
<p>You better not blame me for diverting the discussion. </p>
<p>And do not get carried away and do not call me a moron. Kindly exhibit some sense of mutual respect and decorum in a discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rishi Khujoor</title>
		<link>http://greatbong.net/2010/07/14/why-i-oppose-the-ban-on-the-veil/#comment-848157</link>
		<dc:creator>Rishi Khujoor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatbong.net/?p=11944#comment-848157</guid>
		<description>@ Anirban
Do read my post.
The Sun is part of the discussion when you talk of global warming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Anirban<br />
Do read my post.<br />
The Sun is part of the discussion when you talk of global warming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anirban</title>
		<link>http://greatbong.net/2010/07/14/why-i-oppose-the-ban-on-the-veil/#comment-848154</link>
		<dc:creator>Anirban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greatbong.net/?p=11944#comment-848154</guid>
		<description>While I wholeheartedly support the ban on the veil, and also do not quite agree that Islam is not relevant to the issue, I must say Justice and Rishi are just proving themselves stupid saying global warming is due to the sun. Guys, if you suggested a wrong analogy, accept it and move on! You have put your points and some people have accepted them. You don&#039;t have to redefine the meaning of global warming to prove the ban on burqa is justified.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I wholeheartedly support the ban on the veil, and also do not quite agree that Islam is not relevant to the issue, I must say Justice and Rishi are just proving themselves stupid saying global warming is due to the sun. Guys, if you suggested a wrong analogy, accept it and move on! You have put your points and some people have accepted them. You don&#8217;t have to redefine the meaning of global warming to prove the ban on burqa is justified.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: greatbong.net @ 2012-02-09 08:32:29 -->
